America's Overwatch

Editorial Standards

How we verify every claim. Our non-negotiable rules for truth.

Our Core Principles

Every fact-check published by America's Overwatch follows rigorous standards developed from decades of journalism experience and aviation's safety culture—where accuracy isn't optional, it's survival.

The Five Non-Negotiables

  1. Multiple Independent Sources: We never rely on a single source or partisan outlet.
  2. Primary Documentation: We go to the original source—official records, transcripts, data.
  3. Full Context: No cherry-picking. You get the complete picture.
  4. Editorial Review: Experienced editors verify every claim before publication.
  5. Complete Transparency: Every source cited. You can verify everything yourself.

Verification Process

Step 1: Source Identification

We monitor 128+ news sources daily, from CNN to Fox News, from The New York Times to The Wall Street Journal. When a significant claim emerges—whether in traditional media, social media, or political discourse—it enters our queue for verification.

Step 2: Research & Documentation

Our researchers dig deep to find:

Step 3: Fact-Checking Standards

To rate a claim as TRUE, FALSE, or MISLEADING, we require:

Step 4: Editorial Review

Before publication, every fact-check undergoes review by senior editorial staff who verify:

Ratings Explained

TRUE

The claim is accurate based on available evidence and primary sources. All significant facts check out, and context supports the claim as stated.

MISLEADING

The claim contains factual elements but omits critical context, cherry-picks data, or presents information in a way that could deceive. Technically accurate but practically dishonest.

FALSE

The claim is demonstrably incorrect based on available evidence. Facts contradict the claim, or no credible evidence supports it.

What We Don't Do

Just as important as what we do is what we refuse to do:

Corrections Policy

When we make mistakes—and we're human, so we will—we fix them immediately:

Conflicts of Interest

We maintain strict policies to avoid conflicts of interest:

Student Training Standards

Student researchers work under direct supervision of experienced editors and must:

Questions About Our Standards?

We welcome scrutiny. If you have questions about our methodology or believe we've made an error, contact us. We'll investigate and respond.

Browse Glossary by Letter